Issue 9: Defense Mechanisms in Interdisciplinary Approaches to Classical Studies and Beyond

this record is part of The AWOL Index

JSON version

description
Nowadays people speak of "defense mechanisms" as both negative and positive forms of behavior: examples of negative forms are denial, repression, acting out, projection, rationalization, intellectualization, while one of the few positive forms is assertion, a way of responding that takes the middle ground between aggressive and passive. In the spirit of this positive form of assertion and in both technical and non-technical senses of the expression "defense mechanisms," the present issue of Classics@ has been given its title. The aim is to publish online research papers and essays in Classics and in other disciplines, related or unrelated, that explore strategies where the primary purpose is to defend assertively rather than attack. The justification is straightforward: discoveries and discovery procedures in research require and deserve a reasoned defense.
domain
chs.harvard.edu
is part of
keywords
classics, journal, journal issues
languages
en
resource_key
dbaedc6f95cf104f1b2acd9474fe55825a2c4cf7
url
http://chs.harvard.edu/wa/pageR?tn=ArticleWrapper&bdc=12&mn=4026
volume
9

data provenance

27 Oct 2015 18:38:17 UTC
data source: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-116259103207720939.post-2017436921866171983 (last updated: 18 Jan 2014 20:37:46 UTC)
27 Oct 2015 18:38:17 UTC
metadata document: ancientworldonline.blogspot.com/2011/08/open-access-journal-classics.html (last updated: 18 Jan 2014 20:37:46 UTC)